Of the possibility of such fraud is known and without employees. Just have some knowledge about stock trading and the characteristics of the Mt4 platform.
Once upon a time, Valery Maltsev wrote this video to prove that our company works with pure stock quotations. In this video, he shows how he exhibits applications listed in your account, and how those quotes reflected in Metatrejdere.
Unfortunately, this video was to show the honesty of the company's work with the client. Came out so that it began to use against us.
In connection with these words and a question was raised as to name this type of trade fraud you are afraid to call human wickedness Is fraudster. He did not cheat. but is it.
Really funny. I'm a pro " Ivan " you " Bolvana " Pro. Any trader can be supplier quotations on the stock exchange, it's enough to have an account with " direct " broker, the broker gives way to the stock exchange. And open such account easier parennoj turnip. Open an account and moving quotes in the right direction. If you don't understand, you are really not very competent in matters of Exchange trade and commerce in Mt.
You read what is written by me, I just about it and say that you wrote your the client but do not âvlâllsâ such a trader's stock exchange were not lots of it and your words I figured. so here you do not understand who and why a while to uppercase the truth.
Message from Tang
On the territory of Russia is the legislation of Russia and not ofšorov. ask any lawyer outside of your company if in doubt in that, is the basis of the law of any country. Diplomats I's calculation does not take the floor.
Yes, if the contract does not say otherwise. In our Client Agreement stated that the applicable Russian legislation.
Even if the Treaty and will be said innoe the Rossiiskie laws take precedence. not only if the Treaty would point that is contrary to the laws of Russia he by any Court of Russia is found to be invalid, for example some companies put in the customer agreement for which the client waives claims against the company on the territory of Russia and all claims against the company are entitled to only remain offshore. I don't about you but led the example simple.
Else labuda irrelevant to complete without so add comment do not see the point of broko I learned that you can engage in fraud, but fraud is this new to me: the funny thing that trying to ûlit′ considering themselves right. Turning words buddy namely that time whose quotes are real and whose not. in case the output is parsed real exchange lots on. If it was then we could talk about manipulating prices, but there is no need to Depot as the client was Actually. I expressed the opinion that this is and remind my opinion that I have the right to let the people decide. afterwards, who lie here. I personally trust company does not inspire.
Here are your words where you called this type of trade fraud you or tupit′ started neznaâ from your own words to give or just don't read what you write and do not remember.
Do not confuse charisma with " " " " eggs. The " in fact " is a fraud-in court may not qualify as a fraud (from a legal point of view). You asked whether people believe (in the legal sense) I clearly ovtetil-No. Dal′š already " tupit′ " (as you deign to speak) have you-ceplâs′ for words and trying to get away from the subject of the dispute, by its essence, prtiâgivaâ behind the ears. This is not serious.
By the way, where references to the Constitution and the Treaty that it violate?
In connection with these words and a question was raised as to name this type of trade fraud you are afraid to call human wickedness Is fraudster. He did not cheat. but is it.
Read the above. There is a legal concept of fraud, and there are " oŝestvennoe " based on the essence of the action rather than laws.
You read what is written by me, I just about it and say that you wrote your the client but do not âvlâllsâ such a trader's stock exchange were not lots of it and your words I figured. so here you do not understand who and why a while to uppercase the truth.
No comments. Read us on Exchange trade in the framework of this debate will not. Teach math " ".
And here on Exchange, etc.. Never realized. I'll even clearly explained how moving quotes. You do not understand. So little understanding of the issue. So " let us argue about taste of oysters, with those who ate ".
Else labuda irrelevant to complete without so add comment do not see the point.
What's wrong? :) As " is bought by " talk to us-so we should comment on it. Again, not serious. However, we will expect.
Message from Тан
From broko I found out that you can engage in fraud, but fraud is this new to me.
Read the above.
Message from Тан
The funny thing that trying to ûlit′ considering themselves right. Turning words buddy
Tang, ", remove the first stem from his eyes ".
Your words and turn it is difficult, because it is difficult to understand what you are saying and why. During that fight, that are trying to find out ...
Message from Тан
namely that time whose quotes are real and whose not. in case the output is parsed real exchange lots on. If it was then we could talk about manipulating prices
With this show or not finding lots on the Exchange?. I very clearly explained to you how to do it. Sorry, can not be clearer.
Finding or not finding lots on the market cannot get under manipulation. Oh no ... (E)
Message from Тан
Actually, I was the opinion that it's remind my opinion that I have the right to let the people decide. afterwards, who lie here. I personally trust company does not inspire.
Here very clearly. We understand your opinion, although we believe that it is built on the zabluždene. It's our opinion-to which we are entitled.
I'm a Pro is heard when a trader opens a huge lot-the price is moving towards a deal, but it should be a great lot to give traffic price?
Any transaction at the stock exchange is reflected in the price. Any-regardless of the lot. If the next transaction made at previous, naturally the price change is not going to happen. But if the next deal is different from previous something will upload in price. A transaction can be any lot, including as low as possible.
Message from FXWizard
is it possible to make a revision, kakojnibud′ an indicator which tells you that the market is open lot say a million? This indicator is not prevented, on a real stock exchange without intermediaries and spreads can be seen who a sum has been opened, so it is easier to make a decision.
I don't remember what her site, but there's a program and you can see the opening transaction and at what amount at the moment and what's interesting-there is no spreads.
This indicator is difficult to do because the volume of the transaction is foreseen. Even the applications are visible in the glass could not say what the deal was going to be a next time.
See the real volume of the FOREX prakičeski. Much in the same manner that I described above. In addition, there is no central place on FOREX trades, so the amount of one particular vendor may not reflect the true state of affairs. Moreover, FOREX market dealer, so it is impossible to say whether or not the amount of influence the price all depends on how much the dealer is willing to take on exhibited his quote.
Any transaction at the stock exchange is reflected in the price. Any-regardless of the lot. If the next transaction made at previous, naturally the price change is not going to happen. But if the next deal is different from previous something will upload in price. A transaction can be any lot, including as low as possible.
Here confusion-if the next transaction made at previous transactions-the price will not change.
Is a cycle. In order to place a second transaction at a price different from the first-the price should change under the influence of a third force, a trader that how can change the price of the item?
Currently I view this process:
Open 1 lot for buying-price grows a little. And while the amount of purchases exceeds the sales price will rise. So?
But then the trader with mikrolotami hardly be able to push the price, competing with major players.
Here confusion-if the next transaction made at previous transactions-the price will not change.
Is a cycle. In order to place a second transaction at a price different from the first-the price should change under the influence of a third force, a trader that how can change the price of the item?
Currently I view this process:
Open 1 lot for buying-price grows a little. And while the amount of purchases exceeds the sales price will rise. So?
But then the trader with mikrolotami hardly be able to push the price, competing with major players.
Here is another. In the market there are always 3 prices: bid, ask and last.
Last is the price of the last transaction, all graphs are drawn on lastu (at the Exchange Tools). In fact, only need a last information for analysis. Commercial load he no is-it's just that perfect deal.
Another thing to ask and bid. Regardless of what was the last price of the ctal-future transactions will be bid or idit ask price. And the level of bid and askov could evade the lasta. At likvidah he practical does not deviate from the lasta. The illiquid instruments either in the nelikvidnoe time-he can otklanât′sâ very značitl′no.
As I wrote, any trader can simply quote vysavtit′ by sending an order to the stock exchange. Last price of course does not change, but what is the difference, in fact the performance only if bid or ask price. But he just changed from the trader.
Broco Representative Can you explain why only that you finally advised to do a direct violation of the rules of your own forum? you really don't know?
(second registration for the Forum is prohibited by the rules. writing messages on behalf of the currently banned banned Moi claims rules, in accordance with the established procedure and I simply ignored. Unlike your moderators forum forum rules respect)
Read the above. There is a legal concept of fraud, and there are " oŝestvennoe " based on the essence of the action rather than laws.
So you're on grounds which the relationship with the client has not paid by public money? or? Because contract legal as far as I understand it? or not?
Tang, ", remove the first stem from his eyes ".
Your words and turn it is difficult, because it is difficult to understand what you are saying and why. During that fight, that are trying to find out ...
So you can vidneë it vynite pomožite? a fight I do not speak any human. in our country though since it happens so that you have to fight or for something or what but I have this affliction is maûs′. I just wonder where the truth that's all.
Broco Representative Can you explain why only that you finally advised to do a direct violation of the rules of your own forum? you really don't know?
(second registration for the Forum is prohibited by the rules. writing messages on behalf of the currently banned banned Moi claims rules, in accordance with the established procedure and I simply ignored. Unlike your moderators forum forum rules respect)
Trader you your words aroused me why one suggested that people are not aware of his work and this strange forum. can we not broko in general chat however.
With this show or not finding lots on the Exchange?. I very clearly explained to you how to do it. Sorry, can not be clearer.
Finding or not finding lots on the market cannot get under manipulation. Oh no ... (E)
In the case of OK to interbank Exchange real or no (I do not know how much you still explain more though I know that you understand about what I'm talking about) and real exchange is possible though that takes a lot of money you can preserve and shares and raise the price you also know you are talking about, but that the withdrawal of lots not falling under manipulation so take your approval once as you argue that lots could not be manipulation means the lots were not OK and had perekryt′sâ a company either opposite lots of clients.
Watched looked at the situation and not survived. The behavior of Brokovcev really terrible. I have a great score himself, but watch the actions of the company and am disappointed.
At one of the forums the client APP showed and proved that customer agreement of which you now proceed was changed retroactively, even read that there are witnesses of this change, and the actually didn't see certain items nor in December or after the February-March.
Just these innovations in hindsight the Agreement allow you not to pay the customer profits.
Replicas on the implementation of the decision itself I KROUFR KROUFR don't understand. If you did not return a profit to the customer, what is the solution?
KROUFR very clear verdict, and he is in full payment of profits to the client.
And still very troubling. Sometimes your terminals provide arrows, which has been in the market. I am a long-term deal, rarely go into the Terminal. But these arrows can dislodge the warrant.
What else specifically troubling: I somehow you must inform himself about the patch. You cannot say is not correct
If I do not pass within 2 days, I refuse to correct. If you take into account the actions of the company (easier with hindsight to correct agreement and not to profit, and you probably are, so understand the decision originally kroufor)
the money I won't return, and if they are big and delicious and volumes, dolbis′-nedolbis′, kroufor, write nepiši, you'll be glad to deny and not to correct your mistakes, especially under the agreement possible.
OK well at all on the client agreement, nothing broke, but nerves certainly spoiled.
How could I believe you? After all, you have my money. that was my big mistake. This is nepereroslo in tragedy, it is necessary to fix it. Open you score same plum software.
already starting to think about withdrawals!
at least open accounts in other companies and raz′û.
So you're on grounds which the relationship with the client has not paid by public money? or? Because contract legal as far as I understand it? or not?
Tan, you're so kidding or seriously not understand? :) The transaction has been annulirovanye under the prizakah manipulation of prices, which allows you to cancel the financial result, which found signs of manipulation of prices.
If this proposal is something not clear-contact. In lichku.
Reply with quote
Trader you your words aroused me why one suggested that people are not aware of his work and this strange forum.
can we not broko in general chat however.
Linear mode
